ARL Military Engagement Program Logo
  • Register
  • Log In
ARL Military Engagement Program Logo
  • Register
  • Log In

2025 Senior Capstone Immersion Program (SCIP) – Student Researcher Exit Interview

Step 1 of 8 – Evaluation Instruction and Information

0%

Evaluation Instruction and Information

CONSENT
You are invited to participate in an online evaluation for the 2025 Senior Capstone Immersion Program conducted by Chitra Productions. Completing the evaluation should take about 15-20 minutes. The aim of this evaluation is to collect feedback that will help the team ensure the project’s outcomes can be replicated. The information gathered will be analyzed to assess the program’s effectiveness and educational value.

PARTICIPATION
All student researchers participating in the student research program are asked to complete the evaluation.

BENEFITS
You will not receive any direct benefits from participating in this evaluation. However, your responses may assist us in refining the program to better support future students in the research program.

RISKS
There are no foreseeable risks associated with completing this evaluation beyond those encountered in everyday life. The data collected will be used solely for evaluation purposes, and no physical, psychological, or social risks have been identified.

CONFIDENTIALITY
Your evaluation responses will be submitted via an online form and stored in a password-protected electronic format. The data will be reported anonymously, ensuring that no names will be included in any reports generated by the elevators.
ELECTRONIC CONSENT(Required)
Please select your choice below.
Clicking on the “Agree” button indicates that
  • You have read the above information
  • You agree to participate

DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

Name(Required)

PROGRAM EVALUATION

Very satisfiedSatisfiedNeutralUnsatisfiedVery unsatisfied
(Your feedback will help us improve future participant experiences.)
Very adequateCompletely metMostly metSomewhat metBarely metDid not meet
(Your feedback will help us improve future participant experiences.)
Extremely relevantVery relevantModerately relevantSlightly relevantNot at all relevant

LEARNING AND DEVELOPMENT

ExcellentVery goodGoodAveragePoor
AlwaysOftenSometimesRarelyNever

RESEARCH EXPERIENCE AND IMPACT

Extremely wellVery wellModerately wellSlightly wellNot at all
Extremely meaningfulVery meaningfulModerately meaningfulSlightly meaningfulNot at all meaningful
To a great extentTo a considerable extentTo some extentTo a small extentNot at all
Very likelyLikelyNeutralUnlikelyVery unlikely
Strongly agreeAgreeNeutralDisagreeStrongly disagree

PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT

In this section, please evaluate the program support staff who assisted you with onboarding, travel, housing, and overall guidance throughout your participation in the program.
Extremely well-organizedVery well-organizedModerately well-organizedSlightly well-organizedNot at all organized
Yes, very clearlyYes, somewhat clearlyNeutralNo, not very clearlyNo, not at all clearly
Very satisfiedSatisfiedNeutralDissatisfiedVery dissatisfied
How satisfied were you with the level of communication from the program staff regarding research program related information?
Did you feel adequately supported by the program staff in addressing any challenges or concerns that arose during the research program?
How would you rate the effectiveness of the onboarding process conducted by the program?
How would you rate the accessibility and helpfulness of program staff in providing necessary resources or assistance throughout the research program?
Were the program guidelines and policies clearly communicated to you at the beginning of the research program?
How would you rate the responsiveness of the program staff to your inquiries or requests for support?

MENTOR EVALUATION

Very satisfiedSatisfiedNeutralDissatisfiedVery dissatisfied
How would you rate your mentor’s availability and responsiveness to your questions and concerns?
How would you rate your mentor’s ability to provide constructive feedback on your work?
Did your mentor effectively communicate the goals and expectations of your research program role?
How well did your mentor support your professional development during the research program?
How would you rate the mentor’s knowledge and expertise in the relevant field or industry?
Did your mentor provide opportunities for you to expand your skills and knowledge beyond the scope of your research program tasks?
How effective was your mentor in helping you navigate challenges or obstacles encountered during the research program?
How well did your mentor facilitate your integration into the team or organization?
Overall, how satisfied were you with the mentorship provided by your mentor during the research program?

Thank You

Thank you for completing this evaluation. Your feedback is greatly appreciated and will help us improve the program for future participants.
  • SCIP Program
  • SMC Faculty Fellowship
  • Apply Now

Contact our help desk

  • 866-673-7061
  • support@smcresearchopportunities.com

Subscribe for Announcements

  • Student Announcements
  • Academia Announcements
DEVCOM Logo

COPYRIGHT ©2023 - 2026. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

✕
  • Senior Capstone Immersion Program (SCIP)
    • Apply Now – SCIP
  • SMC Faculty Fellowship Program (SMC FFRP)
    • Apply Now – SMC FFRP
  • ROTC Cadet Apprenticeship Program (CAP)
  • Davies Postdoctoral Fellowship
  • Military Dependent Virtual STEM Camp

Contact our help desk

  • 866-673-7061
  • support@smcresearchopportunities.com

Subscribe for Announcements

  • Student Mailing List
  • Academia Mailing List